dior j adore duty free price marries she will choose someone huge so that if they decide to have children the kids will at least have a chance to grow to normal size.">
Page 1 of 1. This book was really good! But I really wanna know what happened with Theo and Kathrine at the end! I can see why this book can help young girls see how forever is a really long time.. Great message. The book was good and it included a lot about sexual health. As well as becoming a woman. The ending was just very sad. Judy should make a follow up book about it. Forever is about young love and first sexual experiences, and it presents a wonderfully positive message about how meaningful those experiences can be under the right circumstances.
Sex is fun, kids, but you have to be safe, too, and Judy Blume wants you to know it. This book is readable and easy to relate to, and it manages to address important issues without being preachy.
Read my full review at The Book Lady's Blog. Written in the seventies, Forever manages to have a fairly timeless quality to it, touching on subject matter and emotions relevant to coming of age in any era. The premise is very, very simple, Katherine, in the last half of her senior year of high school falls in love for the first time, and she navigates all the complicated territory that comes along with that, such as sex, maintaining your own identity in a couple with college looming on the horizon, does she switch paths to be closer to him?
On the one hand, the quick pace suited the story, it kind of mimicked how fast your life and your feelings change at that age, it captures the hurried intensity. On the other hand, I would have liked to see this book be just a little bit longer to fully explore some of the topics this really only brushes up against like teen pregnancy, mental health, and questioning your sexuality.
Still, this is solid storytelling that has aged incredibly well, if you like realistic contemporary young adult books, this is definitely worth a try. Katherine and Michael are in their senior year of high school and totally in love. This now classic novel depicts their relationship and exploration of sex in a mature and responsible way. Forever serves its stated purpose well: to educate young people about sex and responsible sexual practices through a fictional story with characters who are easy to identify with.
Aside from a few minor details, the story has aged surprisingly well, which may be attributed to the overall lack of character development, plot, and description. For such a long time, this was THE book about sex for youth. Sex certainly isn't as taboo as it once was, although still causes concern for some. I wonder how this fits into the genre now. A fun dissertation might be to examine sex in YA books.
I'm sure someone has done it already. What are the proportions of depictions: romantic, erotic, abusive, cautionary, others? This was a really interesting book. It was really different from other Judy Blume books I've read, and more explicit than I expected—but I think the shock of that isn't because the book is really very explicit, but rather because it's more explicit than I would have expected from Judy Blume. This book deals with a lot of important topics for teens, especially teen girls.
Safe, mutually rewarding sex is a big theme of the book, which I liked. It's unusual for a book to take up that topic head-on. And I liked that the book emphasized that the main character felt comfortable and safe with her partner emotionally, just as much as it emphasized having safe sex.
The other big theme of the book is love, specifically first love. Nowadays it might seem like 18 is actually a bit old for a first love, but in this book Katharine, the main character, is definitely feeling romantic love and real physical attraction for the first time. The book is about how love makes you feel, how you think about the one you love, what happens as the relationship progresses, how first love isn't always last love, and how that's okay.
I just wish that I had read this when I was in high school. This book, simple in its form, tells the story of Kath and Michael during the s.
They are two year-olds that decide to have sex and guess what Kath's life revolves around tennis, her friends, and her family. We get real insights as to what's inside the teen's head and what really happens when she graduates and gets ready to go to college. The bad language is minimal, the sex is What is also amazing to me is how Blume praise Judy Blume!
The doctor's examination is explained, and the scenario is not scary. Kath explains her nervousness, but then says "[that] was nothing". This is a MUST-read for any teen going through that first relationship with sex and all the feels.
I first read Forever in my pre-teens or teen years, my memory is a little rusty on that. I do remember it was the 80's and at the time I read it I was very surprised by the content. I couldn't believe a teen book would so openly discuss the topic of sex. And I always remember that is was a favorite book of mine. So when I came across it again over a year ago on Goodreads, I decided to get a copy for my Kindle and now I've finally re-read it and realize that I had forgotten basically everything about it.
It was like reading it for the first time again. The only thing I recognized was a line that I never forgot to this day that for the life of me I couldn't remember where I heard it or read it. I did wonder at one point if it was from a Judy Blume book but I couldn't be sure. And I've always agreed with that statement. The consequences that can come from such a monumental step can be devastating if not entered into prepared. It also doesn't matter the age although the younger the more mistakes are likely.
Blume wrote a very brave and honest depiction of a young person's coming of age story that will always be current no matter the decade. One thing that struck me was the openness and courage of the young people in this story compared to the contemporary books I read today. Katherine, Erica, Michael and Artie were very forthcoming with their feelings and opinions. No beating around the bush. The parents were actually present and involved too.
Of course I do love my modern contemporary but it was refreshing to step back in time and just be real for a moment. Speaking of stepping back in time it was the seventies so the Sex, Drugs, that includes alcohol, and maybe a little Rock and Roll, were present and accounted for, but not in an out of control way.
Without these cookies, we can't provide services to you. These cookies allow us to monitor OverDrive's performance and reliability. They alert us when OverDrive services are not working as expected. Without these cookies, we won't know if you have any performance-related issues that we may be able to address. These cookies help us understand user behavior within our services.
For example, they let us know which features and sections are most popular. This information helps us design a better experience for all users. A Winner of the A. Margaret A. This book was first published in My daughter Randy asked for a story about two nice kids who have sex without either of them having to die. She had read several novels about teenagers in love.
If they had sex the girl was always punished—an unplanned pregnancy, a hasty trip to a relative in another state, a grisly abortion illegal in the U. At least one life ruined. Girls in these books had no sexual feelings and boys had no feelings other than sexual. Sex is such an incredibly normal part of life.
As an adult in a committed relationship, I am constantly baffled by how stressed out my friends and I used to be about sex. Who was having it, who wasn't having it, how many people you'd had it with Finally, the forever, of course, is not really forever. And that's okay! It's healthy and normal to have romantic relationships with different people.
Overall this book is really quite sweet, and I'd be more than happy to have my future daughter read it. It has ever since my first read at around age fourteen or so been a novel to appreciate and read over and over again, especially since it is still considered so controversial that an unfortunately high number of ranting parental ignoramuses often the puritanical religiously fanatical types continue to desire the book to be universally banned, namely that they want not simply their own children, their own teenagers to NOT be allowed to read Forever , they basically strive to undemocratically and dictatorially deny like a bunch of Nazis or Stalinists ALL children, ALL young adults across the board, the basic right of freedom of choice, the freedom to read.
And please do bare with me if this review of Forever might not be as coherent and as "organised" as some of my other offerings as I often have issues posting about my personal favourites and with many of the latter, I actually am much happier and more comfortable presenting general musings and personal reactions.
Now I remember first reading Forever in the early 80s when I was in junior high school in Calgary, Alberta, to be exact. It was all the rage in my class and since many of our teachers and parents were categorically against us reading this book at school or at all , it not only made Forever incredibly enticing, it also of course made us clandestinely take copies of the novel to school, not only to read it on the sly so to speak, but of course also to rebelliously allow those classmates who were not allowed to read Forever at home the chance to do so at school and I got my first dose of respect from my erstwhile bullying classmates when they realised that I had actually managed to entice my mother to purchase a copy of Forever for me.
But of course, my mother truly believed that Forever was simply a novel about first love and I definitely made sure not to mention in any way that Forever was considered quite massively controversial by many, including the majority of my teachers, because while my parents were generally not all that worried about my reading choices, as Germans of the immediately post WWII generation, they also at that time still had the unfortunate tendency to consider books deemed controversial by especially one's teachers, to be at best potentially problematic.
And yes, I do strongly and with a sense of annoyance that has lasted for decades remember how everyone from my teachers to even many of my classmates were constantly talking and pontificating about all of the sexuality presented and featured in Forever and especially the fact that Michael had named his phallus, almost as though the whole book, the whole novel was only, solely about sex, sex, and more sex.
Well, when I finally did read the book, I honestly did not understand and still do not really quite understand what all of the fuss was about. For Forever is most definitely NOT primarily about sex, it is about two teenagers falling in love, engaging in their first heavy duty relationship, and while sex is an important part of that relationship, it is by no means the only theme presented in the novel.
In fact, I think the main points of consideration are the many interpersonal relationships, Katherine's relationship with Michael, her relationship with her friends and immediate family, and also importantly, the loving and sweetly nurturing, emotionally sustaining relationship she has with her grandparents.
After perusing a number of comments from individuals and special interests groups desiring to universally and categorically ban and censor Forever many of these comments unfortunately being nothing but rather offensive and braying tirades one of the main points of contention on which the latter always seem to harp, is usually the possibility and for them actually the absolute probability that the sexuality, the sexual relationship between Katherine and Michael could and generally would entice especially female teenage readers into similar such relationships.
But personally, I for one more than realised after reading Forever the first time, that my teenaged self was not in any way ready or even willing to engage in that kind of emotional, heavy and problematic sexual relationship, or any intense interpersonal non platonic relationship for that matter even with those very few boys at school whom I actually found physically and emotionally attractive and interesting. The candid way Judy Blume describes the ups and downs of Katherine and Michael's relationship, the responsibility required to prevent unwanted pregnancy condoms, but particularly how the use of birth control pills is really seen as the sole responsibility of the woman, of the girl , and especially, Erica's cousin Sybil an actual teenage pregnancy , made me totally realise that I absolutely wanted and needed to wait more than ANY sex education class, any adult preaching abstinence, any condemnation from conservative church groups could remotely have achieved.
Now when I was recently rereading Forever for something like the tenth time or so, I immediately did notice that while I am still absolutely loving and engaging with Katherine as a character, I tend to find Michael and actually many if not most of the presented teenaged male characters, including Michael's friend Artie more than a bit lacklustre, basically stock-like, stereotypical, rather flatly conceptualised, less nuanced and developed, and thus also much less interesting and intriguing than particularly Katherine and her best friend friend Erica and indeed, even Erica's cousin Sybil appears more fleshed out, and no pun is intended here.
And I am not sure if this is a relevant or even a correct and acceptable observation, but I have actually always had somewhat of a feeling that Judy Blume often seems to do a better job depicting, writing about female characters than male characters, that her female characters such as Katherine, Margaret, Deenie, Rachel etc.
And even as much as I have always enjoyed reading about Peter Hatcher and his annoying little brother Fudge in Tales of a Fourth Grade Nothing and its sequels, I actually do tend to now think that Peter's nemesis Sheila Tubman is a much more interesting, more nuanced, albeit I agree, also massively and painfully annoying and infuriating character. Therefore, in Forever , both Michael and by extension his often depressed and lonely friend Artie are not nearly as complex and interestingly depicted, presented as Katherine, Erica, and even Katherine's kid sister Jamie.
And then, when a basically flat and stock character such as Artie is described as having tried to commit suicide, you end up with a bit of a potential problem. For Artie is simply not developed enough as a character; there is not enough to him and not enough of a backstory , and the suicide attempt thus has the unfortunate tendency to feel a bit as being at least somewhat a tacked-on afterthought which I actually find more potentially problematic and unnerving in and of itself than ANY of the scenarios in Forever dealing with sexuality and love making.
Now my original copy of Forver was a white paperback with a girl's picture encased in a simple locket as its front cover unfortunately it fell apart due to multiple rereadings. And in the more recent, more modern version I have now and am reviewing one can see that the cover image has two sets of legs on a bed Katherine's and Michael's, I assume.
And personally, I tend to find said particular cover rather, no actually very much unfortunate and problematic, as it strengthens the presumption that the whole plotline of Forever is about what goes on in the bedroom, that the whole novel is about sex, when it so clearly is not it is about Michael and Katherine falling in love, and later falling out of love, and sexuality is simply part of that equation.
And with regard to the general themes and issues presented in Forever , I tend to actually think that Katherine and Michael for the most part have a much healthier relationship than what is depicted in many more recent YA novels, certainly a lot healthier and normal than many of the rather shallow romances featured in series like Sweet Valley High and especially and creepily Twilight.
They are perhaps a little too much into each other, but that is not abnormal and actually rather common in teenage romances. Neither Michael nor Katherine are and fortunately depicted as being either monsters of depravity or paragons of virtue; they are just a pretty standard teenage couple experiencing their first heavy duty relationship I think Michael is perhaps a bit more emotionally immature, as well as a bit more sexually experienced than Katherine, but that is rather standard as well, unfortunately.
Katherine and Michael thus at least in my opinion certainly do not have an inherently unhealthy relationship in Forever ; they have a relatively standard and normal teenage romance type of relationship, a love that in the end proves not to be as long-lasting, as forever as both protagonists originally and fondly thought and hoped.
Furthermore, I am personally unfailingly glad that Judy Blume has written Forever realistically, that she has not attempted to make either Katherine or Michael into some kind of teenage role models. Sometimes you just want to and need to read a realistic story, an account that also does not shy away from showing the ups and downs, the problems and joys of being a teenager and experiencing love, lust and hormones. And this was indeed one of the main reasons I enjoyed Forever so much as a teenager it presented an interesting and engaging narrative, spoke realistically to me, and covered areas and issues about which I would have felt massively weird and uncomfortable approaching and asking my parents, areas and issues that my parents also likely would not have enjoyed discussing with me either.
And I would like to just again reiterate the following. While I consider Forever a wonderful and in many ways even important novel, I do recognise the fact that it is controversial and that many actually despise the book and consider it anathema. But while I can both understand and even albeit a bit grudgingly appreciate this, I can NOT and will NOT accept in any manner, in any way, those individuals, those so-called special interest groups who that have over the years challenged the novel and attempted to have it banned, have it removed from library shelves and so on and so on.
Everyone has different tastes, and everyone also has different levels of comfort, of what he or she can handle, can accept in a book and elsewhere. However, while a parent, while anyone might indeed have the right to monitor and even restrict his or her own child's reading choices, he or she does NOT or rather should NOT have the right or even the presented legal opportunity to impose this on others book censorship, book banning, these are simply and profoundly dictatorial, and those who attempt to get books banned and censored are basically and for all intents and purposes undemocratic, Fascist, Stalinist, you name it.
Frankly, those who want to have Forever censored or banned are a collective and dangerously ignorant threat and they are basically profoundly and dangerously undemocratic in every way. And I will both gladly and with no shame or guilt whatsoever loudly call anyone in favour of censoring or wanting Forever universally banned or removed from schools and libraries are raging Nazi or Stalinist to their bigoted faces and since I also am of the firm opinion and belief that once children reach their teenage years, parents really should no longer have all that much of a right to restrict reading choices anymore, I totally do not feel at all guilty in any way about during high school letting friends whose parents were actively preventing them from reading Forever at home peruse my copy at school, yay for rebellion.
Jan 25, Latasia rated it it was amazing. Forever By Judy Blume is another one of my favorite books. I read this book a million times, and it seems like when i read it, the story seems brand new to me. This book is about young love, something that all teens can relate to.
Katherine is a young teen who is in high school. She is starting to get the experience of sex when she finds the love of her life, a boy name Michael. She doesn't want to loose her virginity for the satisfaction or curiosty, she really wants it to be right and special. She wants her relationship with Michael to have emotions attached to it. Katherine learns more than just what it means to have a sexual relationship.
She matures through the process, gains confidence, and discovers that when one is young, sometimes "forever" does not mean the same thing as "everlasting. I learned alot from this book, it was something that i found very interesting. Teens deal with the curiosty of sex all the time, and they are afraid to say how and what they feel about it.
Judy Blume is one of my favorite authors. I feel she knows how to address the topics or issues in which teens deal with. When this book was written, it caused alot of controversy. It was baned because, it was thought to not be appropriate for teens. The things that were being discussed in the book was in detail. I feel that teens need to read things that they can relate to because it lets them see that they aren't alone in the world, and they don't have to be afraid of what they think and feel.
I would reccomend this book to young adults, and even adults. Adults think they know everything, but they need to know that everything that they experienced a long time a go isn't the same. Things have changed alot from back then, there are brand new issues everyday with teens. And this book is perfect for young adults to get a greater look in the issues that they face everyday. I guarantee that reading this book will have you speechless. You won't want to put this book down.
Sex is a big topic that is always presented as bad, and adults always persuade us not to do it. As teens we are going to want to do what we want, and we are much smarter than people think. Sex isn't bad, you just need to know how to protect yourself from STD's and Pregnancy. Enjoy the book! Jun 16, RachelAnne rated it liked it Shelves: youngadult , novels.
A rather lackluster narrative of a teen relationship, Forever is still noteworthy for a couple of reasons: 1. It's the first-written ya book I know of where the kids fall in love, make a responsible decision to have sex and neither is killed, maimed, impregnated or emotionally scarred for life.
Blume depicts two teens who fall in love with one another, have a fulfilling if somewhat blah relationship, and fall out of love. There's no patronizing insinuation that teens are too young to be in A rather lackluster narrative of a teen relationship, Forever is still noteworthy for a couple of reasons: 1.
There's no patronizing insinuation that teens are too young to be in love, and no insistence that love is always forever. Sep 24, K.
Actual Rating: 2. And I mean: All. Seriously, he was just a big no-no. Is this just me? Simply said, I am not a fan of this book. Wow, finally a book by Blume I didn't enjoy or think was well done. This is a famous piece of hers because of the controversy of underage sex during dating.
It has been frequently banned. It's one that has eluded my collection for years and once I finally found it, read it quickly but was left disappointed. Blume is usually pro at weaving realistic situations, writing emotional depth convincingly, and propelling average stories forever with oomph, but here it all fell short. It felt too forced, a Wow, finally a book by Blume I didn't enjoy or think was well done. It felt too forced, as if it was something she was trying to write about but missed the mark on.
Despite the heavy subject matter, the language was too simplistic and empty for what it accomplished, unconvincing. In times past this was an important, controversial book. Sex among teens in books now isn't as taboo and the world is more jaded. Back then a lot of kids needed a respectful fiction source to go to about sex, experiences, and questions.
Love was supposed to be the driving factor, but the relationship seemed stale, forced, and not realistic to how seventeen year olds feel. Some of the dialogue was cheesy and almost like reading a guide. The ending left a bad taste in my mouth. It was predictable - realistic even - but it felt out there without any substance and irked me emotionally.
Kathy's parents were particularly obnoxious and I would have rebelled at that age with the kind of control they were trying to exert. So, an important book for its time and while the theme hasn't diminished, I don't think the writing was stellar nor the protagonist realistic.
View 1 comment. Sep 04, Briynne rated it it was ok. Didn't like this one either. Another YA Lit book read for class. I guess I didn't like it for two main reasons. I felt more toward Theo in the ten or so pages devoted to him than I did for whats-his-name I literally can't remember even though I read it yesterday, so I guess that helps p Nope. I felt more toward Theo in the ten or so pages devoted to him than I did for whats-his-name I literally can't remember even though I read it yesterday, so I guess that helps prove my point who starred in the entire book.
Secondly, it was predictable. I mean really, really predictable. Maybe if, for even a short, fleeting moment I had thought that maybe those two crazy kids would survive seven whole weeks apart, I would have had some emotional investment. Kinda boring and a little too movie-of-the-week. Oh - and my third rant: the heroine of the story seems just about as dumb as a post. View all 6 comments. Seriously, that's all this book seemed to be about.
I've read New Adult with much less sex and we all know what that genre can be like. I didn't connect with the characters, I couldn't really relate to them much. I think it had to do with how sex-obsessed they were.
I don't feel I can write a full review for this, it didn't really leave me feeling anything at all. All I really did while reading it was roll my eyes. She had read several novels about teenagers in love. If they had sex the girl was always punished—an unplanned pregnancy, a hasty trip to a relative in another state, a grisly abortion illegal in the U.
At least one life ruined. Girls in these books had no sexual feelings and boys had no feelings other than sexual. Neither took responsibility for their actions. I wanted to present another kind of story—one in which two seniors in high school fall in love, decide together to have sex, and act responsibly. The seventies were a time when sexual responsibility meant preventing unwanted pregnancy.
In this book Katherine visits a clinic and is given a prescription for The Pill. Today,she would be told it is essential to use a condom along with any other method of birth control. If you're going to become sexually active, then you have to take responsibility for your own actions.
So get the facts first. She told me herself, the last time she was visiting her cousin, Erica, who is my good friend. The genius I. It turned out to be a fondue party. On the table were a couple of big pots of steaming liquid Swiss cheese and baskets of bread chunks.